This Article Full Text (PDF) Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Saved Citations Download to citation manager Request Permissions Request Reprints Add to My Marked Citations Citing Articles Citing Articles via Google Scholar Citing Articles via Scopus Google Scholar Articles by Fletcher-Louis, C. H.T. Search for Related Content Social Bookmarking                   What's this?

Jesus as The High Priestly Messiah: Part 2

St Mary’s Bryanston Square, London, UK, crispin{at}stmaryslondon.com

Recent study of the priesthood in Second Temple life and thought invites a reconsideration of Jesus’ self- understanding. The appeal to Psalm 110 and Dan. 7.13 indicates that Jesus thought that, although not of priestly lineage, nevertheless he would ultimately be the nation’s king and priest after the order of Melchizedek. Mark 1-6 contains a programmatic statement of Jesus’ claim to a high priestly identity as the ‘holy one of God’ (1.24), with a high priestly contagious holiness (1.40-45; 5.25-34; 5.35-43), freedom to forgive sins (2.1-12) and the embodiment of divine presence in a Galilean cornfield (2.23-28). As true high priest he makes divine presence ‘draw near’ to God’s people (1.15), where before they had to ‘draw near’ to the Jerusalem temple. The hypothesis that Jesus thought he was Israel’s long awaited eschatological high priest resolves otherwise intractable problems in historical Jesus scholarship. This is Part 2 of a two-part essay.

Key Words: blasphemy • Chaoskampf • contagious purity • Day of Atonement • divine warrior • Enoch • forgiveness • High priest • John the Baptist • Melchizedek • messianism • political theology • Sabbath • Son of Man • temple

CiteULike    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    What's this?